It is known from everyday life that battery voltages drop under heavy load. This can be seen, for example, when turning the ignition key in winter: The load from the starter motor is sometimes so great that the low beam or radio briefly cuts out.
Another example are $1.5V$ batteries: If such a battery is short-circuited by a piece of wire, not so much current flows that the piece of wire glows, but noticeably less.
So it makes sense here to develop the concept of the ideal voltage source further. In addition, we will see that this also opens up a possibility to convert and simplify more complicated circuits.
First, the concept of the two-terminal from the chapter basics and basic concepts is to be expanded (Abbildung 1).
After this lesson, you should:
DC Voltage & Current Source Theory
For the ideal voltage source it was defined that it always supplies the same voltage independent of the load. In Abbildung 2, in contrast, an example of a „realistic“ voltage source is shown as an active two-terminal.
This realization shall now be described with some technical terms:
Important: As will be seen in the following, the short-circuit current inside the two-terminal can cause considerable power loss and thus a lot of waste heat. Not every real two-terminal is designed for this.
What is interesting now is the current-voltage characteristic of the circuit in Abbildung 2. This can be seen in the simulation below. The result is a linear curve (see Abbildung 3).
From a purely mathematical point of view, the course can be represented by the basic equation of linear graphs with the y-axis intercept $I_{KS}$ and a slope of $-{{I_{KS}}\over{U_{LL}}}$:
\begin{align*} I = I_{KS} - {{I_{KS}}\over{U_{LL}}}\cdot U \tag{3.1.1} \end{align*}
On the other hand, the formula can also be resolved to $U$:
\begin{align*} U = U_{LL} - {{U_{LL}}\over{I_{KS}}}\cdot I \tag{3.1.2} \end{align*}
So what does the inside of the linear source look like? In Abbildung 4 two possible linear sources are shown, which will be considered in the following.
The linear voltage source consists of a series connection of an ideal voltage source with the source voltage $U_0$ (English: EMF for Electro-Magnetic-Force) and the internal resistance $R_i$. To determine the voltage outside the active two-terminal, the system can be considered as a voltage divider. The following applies:
\begin{align*} U = U_0 - R_i \cdot I \end{align*}
The source voltage $U_0$ of the ideal voltage source is to be measured at the terminals of the two-terminal, if this is unloaded. Then no current flows through the internal resistor $R_i$ and there is no voltage drop there. Therefore: The source voltage is equal to the open circuit voltage $U_0 = U_{LL}$.
\begin{align*} U = U_{LL} - R_i \cdot I \end{align*}
When the external voltage $U=0$, it is the short circuit case. In this case, $0 = U_{LL} - R_i \cdot I_{KS}$ and transform $R_i = {{U_{LL}}\over{I_{KS}}}$. Thus, equation $(3.1.2)$ is obtained: \begin{align*} U = U_{LL} - {{U_{LL}}\over{I_{KS}}} \cdot I \end{align*}
Is this the structure of the linear source we are looking for? To verify this, we will now look at the second linear source.
The linear current source now consists of a parallel circuit of an ideal current source with source current $I_0$ and internal resistance $R_i$, or internal conductance $G_i = {{1}\over{R_i}}$. To determine the voltage outside the active two-terminal, the system can be considered as a current divider. Here, the following holds:
\begin{align*} I = I_0 - G_i \cdot U \end{align*}
Here, the source current can be measured at the terminals in the event of a short circuit. The following therefore applies: $I_{KS}= I_0$
\begin{align*} I = I_{KS} - G_i \cdot U \end{align*}
When the external current $I=0$, it is the no-load case. In this case, $0 = I_{KS} - G_i \cdot U_{LL}$ and transform $G_i = {{I_{KS}}\over{U_{LL}}}$.
Thus, equation $(3.1.1)$ is obtained:
\begin{align*} I = I_{KS} - {{I_{KS}}\over{U_{LL}}} \cdot U \end{align*}
So it seems that the two linear sources describe the same thing.
Through the previous calculations, we came to the interesting realization that both the linear voltage source and the linear current source provide the same result. It is true: For a linear source, both a linear voltage source and a linear current source can be specified as an equivalent circuit! As already in the case of the star-delta transformation, this not only provides two explanations for a black box. Also here linear voltage sources can be transformed into linear linear current sources and vice versa.
The Abbildung 5 compares again the two linear sources and their characteristics:
The conversion is now done in such a way that the same characteristic curve is obtained:
Abbildung 6 shows the characteristics of the linear voltage source (left) and a resistive resistor (right). For this purpose, both are connected to a test system in the simulation: In the case of the source with a variable ohmic resistor, in the case of the load with a variable source. The characteristic curves formed in this way were described in the previous chapter.
The operating point can be determined from both characteristic curves. This is assumed when both the linear voltage source is connected to the ohmic resistor (without the respective test systems). In Abbildung 7 both characteristic curves are drawn in a current-voltage diagram. The point of intersection is just the operating point that sets in. If the load resistance is varied, the slope changes in inverse proportion and a new operating point is established (light grey in the figure).
The derivation of the working point is also here explained again in a video.
Abb. 8: Straight line arrays for source parameter variation
The variation of the different source parameters will be briefly discussed.
For the linear current source, the source current $I_0$ and the internal conductance $G_i$ can be varied. This results in the straight line arrays in Abbildung 8 above. The source current shifts the straight lines while keeping the slope constant. The internal conductance changes only the slope; this results in a straight line array around the intersection $I_0 = I_{KS}$.
Since an ideal current source should always supply the source current, its internal conductance $G_i=0$.
For the linear voltage source, the source voltage $U_0$ and the internal resistance $R_i$ can be varied. This results in the straight line arcs in Abbildung 8 below. The source voltage shifts the straight lines while keeping the slope constant. The internal resistance changes only the slope; this results in a straight line array around the intersection $U_0 = U_{LL}$.
Since an ideal voltage source should always supply the source voltage, its internal resistance $R_i=0$.
After this lesson you should:
In Abbildung 5, it can be seen that the internal resistance of the linear current source measured by the ohmmeter (resistance meter) is exactly equal to that of the linear voltage source.
If you look at the properties of the ohmmeter in the simulation, you will see that a measuring current is used there to determine the resistance value. This concept will still be part of the electrical engineering lab experiment on resistors in the 2nd semester.
However, a very large measuring current of $1A$ is used here. This could lead to high voltages or destruction of components in real setups.
Why is this nevertheless chosen so high in the simulation? Set the measuring current for both linear sources to (more realistic) $1mA$. What do you notice?
The circuit in Abbildung 10 shows this circuit again. The ohmmeter is replaced by a current source and a voltmeter, since only the electrical properties are important in the following. In this setup, it can be seen that the current through $G_i$ is just given by $I_i = I_0 + I_\Omega$ (node theorem). Thus, the two sources in the circuit can be reduced.
This should make the situation clear with a measuring current of $1mA$. The voltage at the resistor is now given by $U_\Omega = R \cdot (I_0 + I_\Omega)$. Only when $I_\Omega$ is very large does $I_0$ become negligible. The current of a conventional ohmmeter cannot guarantee this for every measurement.
But this knowledge can now be used for more complicated circuits. In Abbildung 8 such a circuit is drawn. This is to be converted into a searched equivalent conductance $G_g$ and a searched equivalent current source with $I_g$.
Important here: Only two-terminals can be converted via source duality. This means that only 2 nodes may act as output terminals for selected sections of the circuit. If there are more nodes the conversion is not possible.
Any interconnection of linear voltage sources, current sources, and ohmic resistors can be.
In Abbildung 12 it can be seen that the three circuits give the same result (voltage / current) with the same load. This is also true when an (AC) source is used instead of the load.
If only the equivalent resistance of a more complex circuit is sought, the following approach can be used:
The equivalent circuits for the ideal sources can be seen via the circuit diagrams (see Abbildung 13).
Thus also the equivalent resistance of the complex circuit above can be derived quickly.
For the source current $I_0$ ideal equivalent current source resp. the source voltage $U_0$ ideal equivalent voltage source this derivation can not be used.
The reason that the internal resistance can be determined in this simple way will be explained in the next chapter analysis_of_dc_networks: Superposition method is explained.
After this lesson, you should:
Power and efficiency have already been considered in 1st chapter and 2nd chapter for a simple dc circuit. In the following, this will be analyzed again with the knowledge of two-terminals. This is especially important for the fields of communications and power engineering. The goals here are different:
These two goals seem similar at first, but they are quite different, as will be seen in a moment.
Abb. 15: Power measurement on linear voltage source
First, it is necessary to consider how to determine the power. The power meter (or wattmeter) consists of a combined ammeter and voltmeter.
In Abbildung 15 the wattmeter with the circuit symbol can be seen as a round element with crossed measuring inputs. The circuit also shows one wattmeter each for the (not externally measurable) output power of the ideal source $P_Q$ and the input power of the load $P_R$.
The simulation in Abbildung 16 shows the following:
P_L
plotted against time in a graph.Load resistance R_L
, with which the value of the load resistance $R_L$ can be changed.Now try to vary the value of the load resistance $R_L$ (slider) in the simulation so that the maximum power is achieved. Which resistance value is set?
Abbildung 17 shows three diagrams:
The two powers are defined as follows:
The whole context can be seen in a extensive Simulation will be analyzed again.
In order to understand the lower diagram in Abbildung 17, the definition equations of the two reference quantities shall be described here again:
The efficiency $\eta$ describes the delivered power (consumer power) in relation to the supplied power (power of the ideal source): \begin{align*}\eta = {{P_{out}}\over{P_{in}}} = {{R_L\cdot I_L^2}\over{(R_L+R_i) \cdot I_L^2}} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \boxed{ \eta = {{R_L}\over{R_L+R_i}} } \end{align*}
The efficiency $\varepsilon$ describes the delivered power in relation to the maximum possible power of the ideal source. Here, the currently supplied power is not assumed (as in the case of efficiency), but the best possible power of the ideal source, i.e. in the short-circuit case: \begin{align*}\varepsilon = {{P_{out}}\over{P_{in,max}}} = {{R_L\cdot I_L^2}\over{{U_0^2}\over{R_i}}} = {{R_L\cdot R_i \cdot I_L^2} \over {U_0^2}} = {{R_L\cdot R_i \cdot \left({{U_0}\over{R_L+R_i}}\right)^2} \over {U_0^2}} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \boxed{\varepsilon = {{R_L\cdot R_i } \over {(R_L+R_i)^2}} = {{R_L} \over {(R_L+R_i)}}\cdot {{R_i} \over {(R_L+R_i)}}} \end{align*}
In power engineering a situation close to (1.) in Abbildung 17 is desired: maximum power output with lowest losses at the internal resistance of the source. Thus, the internal resistance of the source should be low compared to the load $R_L \gg R_i $. The efficiency should go towards $\eta \rightarrow 100\%$.
In communications engineering, one situation is different and corresponds to situation (2.): The maximum power is to be taken from the source, without consideration of the losses via the internal resistance. For this purpose, the internal resistance of the source (e.g., a receiver) and the load (e.g., the downstream evaluation) are matched. This case is called {wpde>power matching| power matching or resistance matching}}. The utilization factor here becomes maximum: $\varepsilon = 25\%$
The power adjustment is also here explained again in a video.