It is known from everyday life that battery voltages drop under heavy loads. This can be seen, for example, when turning the ignition key in winter: The load from the starter motor is sometimes so great that the low beam or radio briefly cuts out.
Another example is a $1.5~\rm V$ battery: If such a battery is short-circuited by a piece of wire, not so much current flows that the piece of wire glows, but noticeably less.
So it makes sense here to develop the ideal voltage source concept further. In addition, we will see that this also opens up the possibility of converting and simplifying more complicated circuits.
First, the concept of the two-terminal from the chapter basics and basic concepts is to be expanded (Abbildung 1).
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
DC Voltage & Current Source Theory
For the ideal voltage source, it was defined that it always supplies the same voltage independent of the load. In Abbildung 2, in contrast, an example of a „realistic“ voltage source is shown as an active two-terminal network.
This realization shall now be described with some technical terms:
Important: As seen in the following, the short-circuit current can cause considerable power loss inside the two-terminal network and thus a lot of waste heat. Not every real two-terminal network is designed for this.
What is interesting now is the current-voltage characteristic of the circuit in Abbildung 2. This can be seen in the simulation below. The result is a linear curve (see Abbildung 3).
From a purely mathematical point of view, the course can be represented by the basic equation of linear graphs with the y-axis intercept $I_{\rm SC}$ and a slope of $-{{I_{\rm SC}}\over{U_{\rm OC}}}$:
\begin{align*} I = I_{\rm SC} - {{I_{\rm SC}}\over{U_{\rm OC}}}\cdot U \tag{3.1.1} \end{align*}
On the other hand, the formula can also be resolved to $U$:
\begin{align*} U = U_{\rm OC} - {{U_{\rm OC}}\over{I_{\rm SC}}}\cdot I \tag{3.1.2} \end{align*}
So what does the inside of the linear source look like? In Abbildung 4 two possible linear sources are shown, which will be considered in the following.
The linear voltage source consists of a series connection of an ideal voltage source with the source voltage $U_0$ (English: EMF for ElectroMotive Force) and the internal resistance $R_\rm i$. To determine the voltage outside the active two-terminal network, the system can be considered as a voltage divider. The following applies:
\begin{align*} U = U_0 - R_{\rm i} \cdot I \end{align*}
The source voltage $U_0$ of the ideal voltage source will be measured at the terminals of the two-terminal network if this is unloaded. Then no current flows through the internal resistor $R_i$ and there is no voltage drop there. Therefore: The source voltage is equal to the open circuit voltage $U_0 = U_{\rm OC}$.
\begin{align*} U = U_{\rm OC} - R_{\rm i} \cdot I \end{align*}
When the external voltage $U=0$, it is the short circuit case. In this case, $0 = U_{\rm OC} - R_{\rm i} \cdot I_{\rm SC}$ and transform $R_{\rm i} = {{U_{\rm OC}}\over{I_{\rm SC}}}$. Thus, equation $(3.1.2)$ is obtained: \begin{align*} U = U_{\rm OC} - {{U_{\rm OC}}\over{I_{\rm SC}}} \cdot I \end{align*}
Is this the structure of the linear source we are looking for? To verify this, we will now look at the second linear source.
The linear current source now consists of a parallel circuit of an ideal current source with source current $I_0$ and internal resistance $R_{\rm i}$, or internal conductance $G_{\rm i} = {{1}\over{R_{\rm i}}}$. To determine the voltage outside the active two-terminal, the system can be considered as a current divider. Here, the following holds:
\begin{align*} I = I_0 - G_{\rm i} \cdot U \end{align*}
Here, the source current can be measured at the terminals in the event of a short circuit. The following therefore applies: $I_{\rm SC}= I_0$
\begin{align*} I = I_{SC} - G_{\rm i} \cdot U \end{align*}
When the external current $I=0$, it is the no-load case. In this case, $0 = I_{\rm SC} - G_{\rm i} \cdot U_{\rm OC}$ and transform $G_{\rm i} = {{I_{\rm SC}}\over{U_{\rm OC}}}$.
Thus, equation $(3.1.1)$ is obtained: \begin{align*} I = I_{\rm SC} - {{I_{\rm SC}}\over{U_{\rm OC}}} \cdot U \end{align*}
So it seems that the two linear sources describe the same thing.
Through the previous calculations, we came to the interesting realization that both the linear voltage source and the linear current source provide the same result. It is true: For a linear source, both a linear voltage source and a linear current source can be specified as an equivalent circuit! As already in the case of the star-delta transformation, this not only provides two explanations for a black box. Also, here linear voltage sources can be transformed into linear current sources and vice versa.
The Abbildung 5 compares again the two linear sources and their characteristics:
The conversion is now done in such a way that the same characteristic curve is obtained:
Given: Source voltage $U_0$, resp. open circuit voltage $U_{\rm OC}$, internal resistance $R_\rm i$
in question: source current $I_0$, resp. short circuit current $I_{\rm SC}$, internal conductance $G_\rm i$
$\boxed{I_{\rm SC} = {{U_{\rm OC}}\over{R_\rm i}}}$ , $\boxed{G_\rm i = {{1}\over{R_\rm i}}}$
Given: Source current $I_0$, resp. short-circuit current $I_{\rm SC}$, internal resistance $G_\rm i$
in question: source voltage $U_0$, resp. open-circuit voltage $U_{\rm OC}$, internal resistance $R_\rm i$
$\boxed{U_{\rm OC} = {{I_{\rm SC}}\over{G_\rm i}}}$ , $\boxed{R_\rm i = {{1}\over{G_\rm i}}}$
Abbildung 6 shows the characteristics of the linear voltage source (left) and a resistive resistor (right). For this purpose, both are connected to a test system in the simulation: In the case of the source with a variable ohmic resistor, and in the case of the load with a variable source. The characteristic curves formed in this way were described in the previous chapter.
The operating point can be determined from both characteristic curves. This is assumed when both the linear voltage source is connected to the ohmic resistor (without the respective test systems). In Abbildung 7 both characteristic curves are drawn in a current-voltage diagram. The point of intersection is just the operating point that sets in. If the load resistance is varied, the slope changes in inverse proportion, and a new operating point is established (light grey in the figure).
The derivation of the working point is also here explained again in a video.
The variation of the different source parameters will be briefly discussed.
For the linear current source, the source current $I_0$ and the internal conductance $G_{\rm i}$ can be varied. This results in the straight line arrays in Abbildung 8 above. The source current shifts the straight lines while keeping the slope constant. The internal conductance changes only the slope; this results in a straight line array around the intersection $I_0 = I_{\rm SC}$.
Since an ideal current source should always supply the source current, its internal conductance $G_{\rm i}=0$.
For the linear voltage source, the source voltage $U_0$ and the internal resistance $R_{\rm i}$ can be varied. This results in the straight line arcs in Abbildung 8 below. The source voltage shifts the straight lines while keeping the slope constant. The internal resistance changes only the slope; this results in a straight line array around the intersection $U_0 = U_{\rm OC}$.
Since an ideal voltage source should always supply the source voltage, its internal resistance $R_{\rm i}=0$.
Abb. 8: Straight line arrays for source parameter variation
After this lesson you should:
In Abbildung 9, it can be seen that the internal resistance of the linear current source measured by the ohmmeter (resistance meter) is exactly equal to that of the linear voltage source.
In the simulation, a measuring current $I_\Omega$ is used to determine the resistance value. 1) Let us have a look at the properties of the ohmmeter in the simulation by double-clicking on the ohmmeter. Here, a very large measuring current of $I_\Omega=1~\rm A$ is used. This could lead to high voltages or the destruction of components in real setups.
In order to understand why is this nevertheless chosen so high in the simulation, do the following: Set the measuring current for both linear sources to (more realistic) $1~\rm mA$. What do you notice?
The circuit in Abbildung 10 shows this circuit again. The ohmmeter is replaced by a current source and a voltmeter since only the electrical properties are important in the following. In this setup, it can be seen that the current through $G_{\rm i}$ is just given by $I_{\rm i} = I_0 + I_\Omega$ (node theorem). Thus, the two sources in the circuit can be reduced.
This should make the situation clear with a measuring current of $1~\rm mA$. The voltage at the resistor is now given by $U_\Omega = R \cdot (I_0 + I_\Omega)$. Only when $I_\Omega$ is very large does $I_0$ become negligible. The current of a conventional ohmmeter cannot guarantee this for every measurement.
This knowledge can now be used for more complicated circuits. In Abbildung 11 such a circuit is drawn. This is to be converted into a searched equivalent conductance $G_{\rm eq}$ and a searched equivalent current source with $I_{\rm eq}$.
Important here: Only two-terminal networks can be converted via source duality. This means that only 2 nodes may act as output terminals for selected sections of the circuit. If there are more nodes the conversion is not possible.
In Abbildung 12 it can be seen that the three circuits give the same result (voltage/current) with the same load. This is also true when an (AC) source is used instead of the load.
The equivalent circuits for the ideal sources can be seen via the circuit diagrams (see Abbildung 13).
Thus also the equivalent resistance of the complex circuit above can be derived quickly.
For the source current $I_0$ ideal equivalent current source resp. the source voltage $U_0$ ideal equivalent voltage source this derivation can not be used.
The reason that the internal resistance can be determined in this simple way will be explained in the next chapter network_analysis the superposition method is explained.
By the end of this section, you will be able to:
Power and efficiency have already been considered in 1st chapter and 2nd chapter for a simple dc circuit. In the following, this will be analyzed again with the knowledge of two-terminal networks. This is especially important for the fields of communications and power engineering. The goals here are different:
These two goals seem similar at first, but they are quite different, as will be seen in a moment.
First, it is necessary to consider how to determine the power. The power meter (or wattmeter) consists of a combined ammeter and voltmeter.
In Abbildung 15 the wattmeter with the circuit symbol can be seen as a round network with crossed measuring inputs. The circuit also shows one wattmeter each for the (not externally measurable) output power of the ideal source $P_\rm S$ and the input power of the load $P_\rm L$.
Abb. 15: Power measurement on linear voltage source
The simulation in Abbildung 16 shows the following:
Now try to vary the value of the load resistance $R_\rm L$ (slider) in the simulation so that the maximum power is achieved. Which resistance value is set?
Abbildung 17 shows three diagrams:
The two powers are defined as follows:
The whole context can be investigated in this Simulation with a resistor or this one with a variable load.
To understand the lower diagram in Abbildung 17, the definition equations of the two reference quantities shall be described here again:
The efficiency $\eta$ describes the delivered power (consumer power) concerning the supplied power (power of the ideal source): \begin{align*} \eta = {{P_{\rm out}}\over{P_{\rm in}}} = {{R_{\rm L}\cdot I_{\rm L}^2}\over{(R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i}) \cdot I_{\rm L}^2}} \quad \rightarrow \quad \boxed{ \eta = {{R_{\rm L}} \over {R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i}}} } \end{align*}
Once we want to get the relative maximum power out of a system (so maximum power related to the input power) the efficiency should go towards $\eta \rightarrow 100\%$. This situation close to (1.) in Abbildung 17.
Application:
The utilization rate $\varepsilon$ describes the delivered power $P_{\rm out}$ concerning the maximum possible power $P_{\rm in, max}$ of the ideal source. Here, the currently supplied power is not assumed (as in the case of efficiency), but the best possible power of the ideal source, i.e. in the short-circuit case: \begin{align*} \varepsilon = {{P_{\rm out}}\over{P_{\rm in, max}}} = {{R_{\rm L} \cdot I_{\rm L}^2}\over{{U_0^2}\over{R_i}}} = {{R_{\rm L}\cdot R_{\rm i} \cdot I_{\rm L}^2}\over {U_0^2}} = {{R_{\rm L}\cdot R_{\rm i} \cdot \left({{U_0}\over {R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i}}}\right)^2} \over {U_0^2}} \quad \rightarrow \quad \boxed{\varepsilon = {{R_{\rm L}\cdot R_{\rm i}} \over {(R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i})^2}} = {{R_{\rm L}} \over {(R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i})}}\cdot {{R_{\rm i}} \over {(R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i})}}} \end{align*}
In other applications, the absolute maximum power has to be taken from the source, without consideration of the losses via the internal resistance. This corresponds to the situation (2.) in Abbildung 17. For this purpose, the internal resistance of the source and the load are matched. This case is called impedance matching (the impedance is up to for DC circuits equal to the resistance). The utilization rate here becomes maximum: $\varepsilon = 25~\%$.
Application:
The impedance matching/power matching is also here explained in a German video.
Simplify the following circuits by the Norton theorem to a linear current source (circuits marked with NT) or by Thevenin theorem to a linear voltage source (marked with TT).
Next, we figure out the current in the short circuit. In case of a short circuit, we have $2~V$ in a branch which in turn means there must be $−2~V$ on the resistor. The current through that branch is \begin{equation*} I_R=\frac{2~V}{8~\Omega} \end{equation*}
The current in question is the sum of both the other branches \begin{equation*} I_S= I_R + 1~A \end{equation*}
To substitute the circuit in $b)$ first we determine the inner resistance. Shutting down all sources leads to \begin{equation*} R_{\rm i}= 4 ~\Omega \end{equation*}
Next, we figure out the voltage at the open circuit. Thus we know the given current flows through the ideal current source as well as the resistor. The voltage drop on the resistor is \begin{equation*} R_{\rm i}= -4~\Omega \cdot 2~A \end{equation*}
The voltage at the open circuit is \begin{equation*} U_{\rm S}= 2~V + 1~V + U_R \end{equation*}
For the company „HHN Mechatronics & Robotics“ you shall analyze a competitor product: a simple drilling machine. This contains a battery pack, some electronics, and a motor. For this consideration, the battery pack can be treated as a linear voltage source with $U_{\rm s} = ~11 V$ and internal resistance of $R_{\rm i} = 0.1 ~\Omega$. The used motor shall be considered as an ohmic resistance $R_{\rm m} = 1 ~\Omega$.
The drill has two speed-modes:
Tasks:
You can check your results for the currents, voltages, and powers with the following simulation:
Two heater resistors (both with $R_\rm L = 0.5 ~\Omega$) shall be supplied with two lithium-ion-batteries (both with $U_{\rm S} = 3.3 ~\rm V$, $R_{\rm i} = 0.1 ~\Omega$).
1. What are the possible ways to connect these components?
2. Which circuit can provide the maximum power $P_{\rm L ~max}$ at the loads?
At the maximum utilization rate $\varepsilon = 0.25$ the maximum power $P_{\rm L ~max}$ can be achieved.
The utilization rate is given as:
\begin{align*}
\varepsilon &= {{P_{\rm out}}\over{P_{\rm in, max}}} \\
&= {{R_{\rm L}\cdot R_{\rm i}} \over {(R_{\rm L}+R_{\rm i})^2}} \\
\end{align*}
As near the resulting equivalent internal resistance approaches the resulting equivalent load resistance, as higher the utilization rate $\varepsilon$ will be.
Therefore, a series configuration of the batteries ($2 R_{\rm i} = 0.2~\Omega$) and a parallel configuration of the load (${{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm L}= 0.25~\Omega$) will have the highest output.
3. What is the value of the maximum power $P_{\rm L ~max}$?
Therefore, the maximum power is: \begin{align*} \varepsilon &= {{P_{\rm out}}\over{P_{\rm in, max}}} \\ \rightarrow P_{\rm out} &= \varepsilon \cdot P_{\rm in, max} \\ &= \varepsilon \cdot {{U_s^2}\over{R_{\rm i}}} \\ &= 24.6~\% \cdot {{(3.3~\rm V)^2}\over{0.1~\Omega}} \\ \end{align*}
4. Which circuit has the highest efficiency?
5. What is the value of the highest efficiency?
Further German exercises can be found in ILIAS (see here, page 13 to 15)