Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
| Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
| electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block10 [2025/10/31 11:20] – mexleadmin | electrical_engineering_and_electronics_1:block10 [2025/11/02 17:18] (aktuell) – mexleadmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| - | ====== Block 10 - Field patterns | + | ====== Block 10 - Field Patterns |
| ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| Zeile 5: | Zeile 5: | ||
| < | < | ||
| By the end of this section, you will be able to: | By the end of this section, you will be able to: | ||
| - | * Sketch the field lines of electric fields. | + | * Explain |
| - | * Describe | + | * Distinguish |
| - | * Classify fields as **homogeneous** (e.g., parallel-plate region) or **inhomogeneous** (e.g., point charge); state typical properties near **conductors** (perpendicular | + | |
| - | * Compute $|\vec{E}|$ for a **point charge** | + | * Use the **superposition principle** to construct field patterns. |
| + | * Compute $|\vec{E}|$ for a **point charge** | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| Zeile 19: | Zeile 20: | ||
| For checking your understanding please do the following exercise: | For checking your understanding please do the following exercise: | ||
| - | * 1.2.3 | + | |
| + | | ||
| ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| ===== 90-minute plan ===== | ===== 90-minute plan ===== | ||
| - | | + | |
| - | | + | Quick sketches: single charge, dipole, parallel plates. Poll for rules of field lines and equipotentials. |
| - | - **Field lines**: | + | |
| - | - **Homogeneous vs. inhomogeneous** fields; conductor boundary facts (perpendicular | + | - Rules for **field lines**: |
| - | - Guided simulations (20–25 min) | + | - **Homogeneous vs. inhomogeneous**: parallel-plate region ($E=\frac{U}{d}$) vs. point/ |
| - | | + | - **Conductors in electrostatics**: |
| - | - Short worksheet: sketch | + | |
| - | | + | * **Guided simulations (20–25 min)** |
| - | | + | Move charges, toggle equipotentials, |
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | Summary map linking | ||
| ===== Conceptual overview ===== | ===== Conceptual overview ===== | ||
| Zeile 38: | Zeile 44: | ||
| - **Homogeneous fields** (ideal between large parallel plates): parallel, equally spaced lines; **inhomogeneous fields** elsewhere (e.g., point charges, edges). | - **Homogeneous fields** (ideal between large parallel plates): parallel, equally spaced lines; **inhomogeneous fields** elsewhere (e.g., point charges, edges). | ||
| - **Conductors (electrostatics)**: | - **Conductors (electrostatics)**: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **What field lines mean:** visual aid for $\vec{E}$. \\ they start on positive charge and end on negative charge; their **density** reflects the **magnitude** $|\vec{E}|$; | ||
| + | * **Homogeneous vs. inhomogeneous: | ||
| + | * **Conductors (electrostatics): | ||
| + | * **Superposition: | ||
| + | |||
| </ | </ | ||
| Zeile 124: | Zeile 136: | ||
| In **homogeneous fields**, magnitude and direction are constant throughout the field range. | In **homogeneous fields**, magnitude and direction are constant throughout the field range. | ||
| This field form is idealized to exist within plate capacitors. e.g., in the plate capacitor (<imgref ImgNr07> | This field form is idealized to exist within plate capacitors. e.g., in the plate capacitor (<imgref ImgNr07> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here, the electric field $E$ is given as: $E = {{U}\over{d}}$ | ||
| < | < | ||
| Zeile 135: | Zeile 149: | ||
| For **inhomogeneous fields**, the magnitude and/or direction of the electric field changes from place to place. | For **inhomogeneous fields**, the magnitude and/or direction of the electric field changes from place to place. | ||
| This is the rule in real systems, even the field of a point charge is inhomogeneous (<imgref ImgNr08> | This is the rule in real systems, even the field of a point charge is inhomogeneous (<imgref ImgNr08> | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the given example of a cylindrical configuration woth tha radius $r$, the electric field $E$ is given as: $E \\sim {{1}\over{r}}$ | ||
| + | |||
| < | < | ||
| Zeile 143: | Zeile 160: | ||
| </ | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Stationary Situation of a charged conducting Object (without an external Field) ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the first thought experiment, a conductor (e.g., a metal plate) is charged, see <imgref ImgNr10> | ||
| + | The additional charges create an electric field. Thus, a resultant force acts on each charge. | ||
| + | The causes of this force are the electric fields of the surrounding electric charges. So the charges repel and move apart. \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | |||
| + | The movement of the charge continues until a force equilibrium is reached. | ||
| + | In this steady state, there is no longer a resultant force acting on the single charge. | ||
| + | In <imgref ImgNr10> this can be seen on the right: the repulsive forces of the charges are counteracted by the attractive forces of the atomic shells. \\ | ||
| + | Results: | ||
| + | * The charge carriers are distributed on the surface. | ||
| + | * Due to the dispersion of the charges, the interior of the conductor is free of fields. | ||
| + | * All field lines are perpendicular to the surface. Because: if they were not, there would be a parallel component of the field, i.e., along the surface. Thus, a force would act on charge carriers, and they would move accordingly. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <wrap #edu_task_1 /> | ||
| + | <panel type=" | ||
| + | |||
| + | Point discharge is a well-known phenomenon, which can be seen as {{wp> | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{url> | ||
| + | | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| + | < | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | {{drawio> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the <imgref ImgNr194> | ||
| + | To cope with this complex shape and the desired charge density, the following path shall be taken: | ||
| + | - It is good to first calculate the potential field of a point charge. \\ For this calculate $U_{ \rm CG} = \int_{ \rm C}^{ \rm G} \vec{E} \cdot {\rm d} \vec{s}$ with $\vec{E} ={{1} \over {4\pi\cdot\varepsilon}} \cdot {{q} \over {r^2}} \cdot \vec{e}_r $, where $\vec{e}_r$ is the unit vector pointing radially away, ${ \rm C}$ is a point at distance $r_0$ from the charge and ${ \rm G}$ is the ground potential at infinity. | ||
| + | - Compare the field and the potentials of the different spherical conductors in <imgref ImgNr194>, | ||
| + | - Are there differences for the electric field $\vec{E}$ outside the spherical conductors? Are the potentials on the surface the same? | ||
| + | - What can be conducted for the field of the three situations in (b) and (d), when the total charge on the surface is considered to be always the same? | ||
| + | - For spherical conductors, the surface charge density is constant. Given that this charge density leads to the overall charge $q$, how does $\varrho_A$ depend on the radius $r$ of a sphere? | ||
| + | - Now, the situation in (c) shall be considered. Here, all components are conducting, i.e., the potentials on the surface are similar. Both spheres shall be considered to be as far away from each other, so that they show an undisturbed field near their surfaces. In this case, charges on the surface of the curvature to the left and the right represent the same situation as in (a). For the next step, it is important that by this, the potentials of the left sphere with $q_1$ and $r_1$ and the right sphere with $q_2$ and $r_2$ are the same. | ||
| + | - Set up this equality formula based on the formula for the potential from question 1. | ||
| + | - Insert the relationship for the overall charges $q_1$ and $q_2$ based on the surface charge densities $\varrho_{A1}$ and $\varrho_{A2}$ of a sphere and their radii $r_1$ and $r_2$. | ||
| + | - What is the relationship between the bending of the surface and the charge density? | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| Zeile 172: | Zeile 243: | ||
| ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| + | ===== Common pitfalls ===== | ||
| + | * Treating field lines as **charge paths**: they are drawings of direction/ | ||
| + | * Forgetting the **reference charge sign**: line arrows indicate the force on a **positive** test charge; forces on electrons point opposite to the arrows. | ||
| + | * Mixing up **equipotentials** and field lines: equipotentials are everywhere **perpendicular** to field lines; they do **not** indicate current. | ||
| + | * Assuming the plate field is always perfectly uniform: edge effects make real plate fields **inhomogeneous** away from the central region. | ||
| + | * Ignoring conductor boundary conditions: in electrostatics the interior of a conductor is **field-free** and $\vec{E}$ is **normal** to the surface; any tangential $\vec{E}$ would drive charges until it vanishes. | ||
| + | * Confusing $\vec{E}$ with $\vec{D}$: here we use $\vec{E}$ and **permittivity** $\varepsilon=\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r$ for $|\vec{E}|=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon}\frac{|Q|}{r^2}$. | ||
| + | ~~PAGEBREAK~~ ~~CLEARFIX~~ | ||
| ===== Exercises ===== | ===== Exercises ===== | ||
| <panel type=" | <panel type=" | ||