Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
electrical_engineering_1:non-ideal_sources_and_two_terminal_networks [2023/12/03 23:16] – mexleadmin | electrical_engineering_1:non-ideal_sources_and_two_terminal_networks [2024/10/31 08:26] (aktuell) – mexleadmin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 4: | Zeile 4: | ||
Another example is a $1.5~\rm V$ battery: If such a battery is short-circuited by a piece of wire, not so much current flows that the piece of wire glows, but noticeably less. | Another example is a $1.5~\rm V$ battery: If such a battery is short-circuited by a piece of wire, not so much current flows that the piece of wire glows, but noticeably less. | ||
- | So it makes sense here to develop | + | So it makes sense here to develop the ideal voltage source |
< | < | ||
Zeile 51: | Zeile 51: | ||
This realization shall now be described with some technical terms: | This realization shall now be described with some technical terms: | ||
- | * It is called **open circuit** | + | * It is called **open circuit** |
- | * The term **short circuit** | + | * The term **short circuit** |
- | * In the region between no-load and short-circuit, | + | * The active two-terminal network outputs power to a connected load in the region between no-load and short-circuit. |
- | Important: As will be seen in the following, the short-circuit current can cause considerable power loss inside the two-terminal network and thus a lot of waste heat. | + | Important: As seen in the following, the short-circuit current can cause considerable power loss inside the two-terminal network and thus a lot of waste heat. |
Not every real two-terminal network is designed for this. | Not every real two-terminal network is designed for this. | ||
Zeile 87: | Zeile 87: | ||
\begin{align*} U = U_0 - R_{\rm i} \cdot I \end{align*} | \begin{align*} U = U_0 - R_{\rm i} \cdot I \end{align*} | ||
- | The source voltage $U_0$ of the ideal voltage source | + | The source voltage $U_0$ of the ideal voltage source |
\begin{align*} U = U_{\rm OC} - R_{\rm i} \cdot I \end{align*} | \begin{align*} U = U_{\rm OC} - R_{\rm i} \cdot I \end{align*} | ||
Zeile 358: | Zeile 358: | ||
==== The Characteristics: | ==== The Characteristics: | ||
- | In order to understand the lower diagram in <imgref imageNo14 >, the definition equations of the two reference quantities shall be described here again: | + | To understand the lower diagram in <imgref imageNo14 >, the definition equations of the two reference quantities shall be described here again: |
- | The **efficiency** | + | The **efficiency** |
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
\eta = {{P_{\rm out}}\over{P_{\rm in}}} | \eta = {{P_{\rm out}}\over{P_{\rm in}}} | ||
Zeile 367: | Zeile 367: | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
- | The **utilization rate** | + | Once we want to get the **relative maximum power** out of a system (so maximum power related to the input power) the efficiency should go towards $\eta \rightarrow 100\%$. This situation close to (1.) in <imgref imageNo14> |
+ | |||
+ | Application: | ||
+ | - In __power engineering__ $\eta \rightarrow 100\%$ is often desired: We want the maximum power output with the lowest losses at the internal resistance of the source. Thus, the internal resistance of the source should be low compared to the load $R_{\rm L} \gg R_{\rm i} $. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The **utilization rate** | ||
Here, the currently supplied power is not assumed (as in the case of efficiency), | Here, the currently supplied power is not assumed (as in the case of efficiency), | ||
\begin{align*} | \begin{align*} | ||
Zeile 378: | Zeile 383: | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
- | In __power engineering__ | + | In other applications, |
- | Thus, the internal resistance of the source | + | |
- | In __communications engineering__, one situation is different | + | Application: |
+ | - In __communications engineering__ | ||
+ | - Furthermore, | ||
The impedance matching/ | The impedance matching/ | ||
Zeile 455: | Zeile 461: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | # | + | # |
Two heater resistors (both with $R_\rm L = 0.5 ~\Omega$) shall be supplied with two lithium-ion-batteries (both with $U_{\rm S} = 3.3 ~\rm V$, $R_{\rm i} = 0.1 ~\Omega$). | Two heater resistors (both with $R_\rm L = 0.5 ~\Omega$) shall be supplied with two lithium-ion-batteries (both with $U_{\rm S} = 3.3 ~\rm V$, $R_{\rm i} = 0.1 ~\Omega$). | ||
Zeile 476: | Zeile 482: | ||
\end{align*} | \end{align*} | ||
- | <callout type=" | ||
As near the resulting equivalent internal resistance approaches the resulting equivalent load resistance, as higher the utilization rate $\varepsilon$ will be.\\ | As near the resulting equivalent internal resistance approaches the resulting equivalent load resistance, as higher the utilization rate $\varepsilon$ will be.\\ | ||
Therefore, a series configuration of the batteries ($2 R_{\rm i} = 0.2~\Omega$) and a parallel configuration of the load (${{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm L}= 0.25~\Omega$) will have the highest output. | Therefore, a series configuration of the batteries ($2 R_{\rm i} = 0.2~\Omega$) and a parallel configuration of the load (${{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm L}= 0.25~\Omega$) will have the highest output. | ||
- | </ | ||
- | |||
- | A detailed analysis is shown here | ||
- | {{drawio> | ||
# | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | The following configuration has the maximum output power. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
3. What is the value of the maximum power $P_{\rm L ~max}$? | 3. What is the value of the maximum power $P_{\rm L ~max}$? | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | The maximum utilization rate is: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \varepsilon &= {{{{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm L} \cdot 2 R_{\rm i} } \over { ({{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm L} + 2 R_{\rm i} )^2}} \\ | ||
+ | &= { {0.25 ~\Omega | ||
+ | &= 24.6~\% | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, the maximum power is: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \varepsilon | ||
+ | \rightarrow P_{\rm out} &= \varepsilon | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | & | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | P_{\rm out} = 26.8 W | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | # | ||
4. Which circuit has the highest efficiency? | 4. Which circuit has the highest efficiency? | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | The highest efficiency $\eta$ is given when the output power compared to the input power is minimal. \\ | ||
+ | A parallel configuration of the batteries (${{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm i} = 0.05~\Omega$) and a series configuration of the load ($2 R_{\rm L}= 1.0~\Omega$) will have the highest efficiency. | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | # | ||
5. What is the value of the highest efficiency? | 5. What is the value of the highest efficiency? | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | The efficiency $\eta$ is given as: | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \eta &= { {2 R_{\rm L} }\over{ 2 R_{\rm L}+ {{1}\over{2}} R_{\rm i} }} \\ | ||
+ | &= { { 1.0~\Omega }\over{ 1.0~\Omega + 0.05~\Omega }} | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | \begin{align*} | ||
+ | \eta = 95.2~\% | ||
+ | \end{align*} | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | \\ \\ | ||
+ | # | ||
+ | {{drawio> | ||
+ | |||
+ | # | ||
+ | |||
# | # |