Unterschiede
Hier werden die Unterschiede zwischen zwei Versionen angezeigt.
Beide Seiten der vorigen Revision Vorhergehende Überarbeitung Nächste Überarbeitung | Vorhergehende Überarbeitung | ||
circuit_design:uebung_3.5.2 [2021/11/11 19:28] – slinn | circuit_design:uebung_3.5.2 [2023/06/26 14:04] (aktuell) – mexleadmin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
- | <WRAP pagebreak></ | + | <WRAP pagebreak></ |
Below you will find circuits with an ideal operational amplifier, which are similar to the non-inverting amplifier and whose voltage gain $A_V$ must be determined. | Below you will find circuits with an ideal operational amplifier, which are similar to the non-inverting amplifier and whose voltage gain $A_V$ must be determined. | ||
Zeile 7: | Zeile 7: | ||
* $R_1 = R_3 = R_4 = R$ | * $R_1 = R_3 = R_4 = R$ | ||
* $R_2 = 2 \cdot R$ | * $R_2 = 2 \cdot R$ | ||
- | * $U_I$ comes from a low-resistance source | + | * $U_\rm I$ comes from a low-resistance source |
- | * $U_O$ is due to a high-resistance consumer | + | * $U_\rm O$ is due to a high-resistance consumer |
__Exercises__ | __Exercises__ | ||
- | - Enter the voltage gain $A_V$ for each circuit. A detailed calculation as before is not necessary. | + | - Enter the voltage gain $A_\rm V$ for each circuit. A detailed calculation as before is not necessary. |
- For Figure 7, indicate how the voltage gain can be determined. | - For Figure 7, indicate how the voltage gain can be determined. | ||
- | - Generalize with justification how | + | - Generalize with the following justifications: |
- | - a short circuit of the two OPV inputs must be taken into account, | + | - How has a short circuit of the two OPV inputs must be taken into account? |
- | - Resistances are to be considered | + | - How do resistances have to be considered |
- | - with a terminal ("on one side" | + | - with one terminal (so " |
- | - with one terminal | + | - with both terminals |
- In which circuits do resistors $R_3$ and $R_4$ represent an unloaded voltage divider? | - In which circuits do resistors $R_3$ and $R_4$ represent an unloaded voltage divider? | ||
- | In order to approach the problems, you should try to use the knowledge from the inverting amplifier. It can be useful to simulate the circuits via [[http:// | + | To approach the problems, you should try to use the knowledge from the inverting amplifier. It can be useful to simulate the circuits via [[http:// |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | **__Important__** | + | **__Important__**: |
<WRAP onlyprint> | <WRAP onlyprint> | ||
* How big is the current flow into the inverting and non-inverting input of an ideal operational amplifier? So what voltage drop would there be across a resistor whose one connection only leads to one input of the operational amplifier ($R_3$)? | * How big is the current flow into the inverting and non-inverting input of an ideal operational amplifier? So what voltage drop would there be across a resistor whose one connection only leads to one input of the operational amplifier ($R_3$)? | ||
- | * The operational amplifier always tries to output as much current at the output that the required minimum voltage $U_D$ results between the inverting and non-inverting input. How high can $U_D$ be assumed? Can this voltage also be built up via a resistor ($R_4$)? | + | * The operational amplifier always tries to output as much current at the output that the required minimum voltage $U_\rm D$ results between the inverting and non-inverting input. How high can $U_\rm D$ be assumed? Can this voltage also be built up via a resistor ($R_4$)? |
* Can different resistors (e.g. because they are between the same nodes) be combined? | * Can different resistors (e.g. because they are between the same nodes) be combined? | ||
Zeile 35: | Zeile 35: | ||
<WRAP pagebreak></ | <WRAP pagebreak></ | ||
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
- | ++++ Tipps| | + | ++++ Hints| |
- | * Wie groß ist der Stromfluss in den invertierenden und nicht invertierenden Eingang bei einem idealen Operationsverstärker? | + | * How high is the current flow into the inverting and non-inverting input of an ideal operational amplifier? What voltage drop would there be across a resistor whose one connection only leads to one input of the operational amplifier? |
- | * Der Operationsverstärker versucht stets soviel Strom am Ausgang auszugeben, damit sich zwischen invertierendem und nicht invertierendem Eingang die benötigte minimale Spannung | + | * The operational amplifier always tries to output enough current at the output so that the required minimum voltage is between the inverting and non-inverting input $U_\rm D$ results. How big can $U_\rm D$ be accepted? Can this voltage also via a resistor |
++++ | ++++ | ||
Zeile 48: | Zeile 48: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
| | ||
- | ++++ Tipps| | + | ++++ Hints| |
- | * Wieviel Strom muss über $R_4 = R$ fließen, damit sich die erwartete Spannung | + | * How much current must flow through |
- | * Wieviel Strom muss entsprechend über $R_2 = 2 \cdot R$ fließen? | + | * How much current must flow through |
- | * Wieviel Strom fließt also durch $R_1 = R$? welche Spannung ergibt sich also an $R_1$? | + | * How much current must flow through |
++++ | ++++ | ||
Zeile 64: | Zeile 64: | ||
<WRAP onlyprint> | <WRAP onlyprint> | ||
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
<WRAP pagebreak></ | <WRAP pagebreak></ | ||
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
<WRAP onlyprint> | <WRAP onlyprint> | ||
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
<WRAP pagebreak></ | <WRAP pagebreak></ | ||
- | <WRAP right>< | + | <WRAP right>< |
</ | </ | ||